Skip to the content
The Secular Frontier

The Secular Frontier

The Internet Infidels Blog
☰
  • Home
  • Our Books
  • Our Debates
  • Arguments for Naturalism
  • Archive Index
  • Join Us
  • About Us
Secular Web: Infidels Blog Kids Forum Portal
Support the Internet Infidels
A small donation will help us continue to do great things for the cause of secularism, humanism, and naturalism.
Donation Options
Sponsors
Eddie Tabash
Support the Secular Web
Great Debate, The

Debate 101

Jeffery Jay Lowder | April 30, 2016

If your debate opponent defends a position (call it H1), argue against H1. Don’t argue against positions they don’t hold (H2 or H3 or …).

apologist watch, debates | Comments

Post navigation

[← Moral Arguments for God and Coining a Name for a Common but Fallacious Objection]
[Adamson’s Cru[de] Arguments for God – Part 3 →]

Recent Posts

  • Celebrating New Teachers: Education and Metaphysics with Squaring and Circling
  • Have a Great and Reflective Summer!
  • (Part 6) The Fourfold Cord vs The Threefold Cord: My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • (Part 5) My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • (Part 4) My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • (Part 3) Threes and My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • (Part 2) Threes and My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • (Part 1) My thoughts on Derrida’s “Interpretations at War Kant, the Jew, the German”
  • Why Adam & Eve Really Sinned (It’s God’s Fault) | Determinism | Problems with Libertarian Free Will – Edouard Tahmizian-Richard Carrier Interview
  • My Thoughts on Derrida’s Des Tours de Babel  (In French, 1980; in English, 1985)

  • Home
  • Terms of Service
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Join Us
  • About Us
© 2026 The Secular Web