The Secular Frontier

Bond stresses the difficulty in trying to distill historical information about Jesus from the gospels. She writes: Thus the many chreiai in the Gospels are not primarily repositories of oral tradition, but fundamentally literary creations, crafted to take their place in a larger biographical work... There is most likely some historical fact at the core of these stories, though extracting it from its present literary context would be next to impossible. Other chreiai may have no historical roots at all. Examples might be the so-called nature miracles, such as the accounts of Jesus feeding the multitude (appearing first in Mark 6:32–44). As the early Christ followers compared Jesus to great figures like Elisha and Moses, it would not have been a great leap to move from a belief in a Jesus who could supply sustenance once again to a story in which he actually did so. We might expect the story to draw on both the account of Elisha in 2 Kgs 4:42–44 and the manna in the wilderness (Exod 16:1–36; Num 11 ... Read Article

One of the interesting things about this essay is some of the anti-Jewish overtones in the gospels may stem from literary need born out of the attempt to present universal saving by Jesus. Reinhartz writes: (1) Although the Four Gospels vary with respect to some of the details, they all portray some level of animosity between Jesus and other Jews, they all assign responsibility to the high priests and other leaders, albeit in different ways and to different degrees, and they all portray the crowds—presumably composed of Jews who, like Jesus, are in Jerusalem for the Passover—as shouting for Barabbas to be released and Jesus to be crucified (Matt 27:21; Mark 15:11; Luke 23:18; John 18:40). Crossley, James; Keith, Chris. The Next Quest for the Historical Jesus (pp. 103-104). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. Kindle Edition. (2) A shift in perspective would lead us away from a search for facts and toward Jesus’s broader context and the questions of how and why the historical Jesus came to be seen ... Read Article

Blogging my way through the anthology, Moxnes has the first essay. One tidbit I'd like to highlight is how Jesus challenges societal norms. Moxnes writes: Jesus is calling young men to follow him and leave the patriarchal household and their father (Mark 1:16–20). The new household that Jesus establishes is one without a father (10:28–30); the relations between men are expressed with the term “brothers” (3:35). (Halvor Moxnes "Reception History" in Crossley, James; Keith, Chris. The Next Quest for the Historical Jesus (p. 55). Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.. Kindle Edition.) It is interesting to question whether stories of Jesus breaking with tradition reflects historical truth, or whether it is just a revolutionary literary theme Jesus was clothed in? In this case it seems historical because Paul called Jesus the firstborn of many brothers. ... Read Article

My new Philosophy for Kids book is out today. Please pick up a copy! ... Read Article

I just got my copy with a whopping 32 essay in it so I will be blogging about the volume for a while. ... Read Article

I am going to resurrect my old blog, called Let's Bring Democracy to the USA. So, I will now try to confine my political commentary to that blog and stay more focused on theism vs. atheism, religion vs. secularism, faith vs. skepticism, and Christianity vs. humanism here at The Secular Frontier. Here is my first post on my revived political blog: https://democracy2usa.blogspot.com/2024/11/why-are-americans-so-freaking-stupid.html ... Read Article

I am, once again, ashamed to be an American. We had a clear choice between a pair of decent, intelligent, democracy-loving, competent leaders (Harris and Walz) and a pair of racist, sexist, fascists who are incompetent (Trump and Vance), and yet we Americans made the wrong choice. There are two main possible reasons for this unbelievable and shameful outcome. First, most Americans are either racists, sexists, and/or fascists, or else most Americans are incredibly stupid and ignorant. Most likely, both of these reasons work together to yield the result that we are witnessing today. There are some Americans who are intelligent and well-informed, but who are racists, sexists, and/or fascists. There are some Americans who are stupid and ignorant, but who are not racists, sexists, and/or fascists. And, of course, there are some Americans who are stupid, ignorant, and also racists, sexists, and/or fascists. These three or four different kinds of Americans now constitute the majority in most states. ... Read Article

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qTwBn4vh1o If you're intellectually impatient like me, just start watching at 47:00 when they start to stretch out their hands to cast a magic spell. That the faith community is backing Trump is wonderful. If Trump loses, it will be a powerful argument for the futility of prayer. There are reasons hospitals don't have faith-healer departments. ... Read Article

The most important point made in the debate between Biden and Trump back in June was this point made by President Joe Biden: Donald Trump was the worst president in the history of the United States. Biden provided two good reasons in support of this strong claim: 1. Presidential historians ranked Donald Trump as the worst president in the history of the United States. Biden: Presidential historians "voted who was the worst president in American history. From best to worst. They said (Trump) was the worst in all of American history." True. The 2024 Presidential Greatness Project Expert Survey, released in February, collected responses from 154 presidential historians, which included current and recent members of the American Political Science Association. The survey ranked Biden as the 14th best president in U.S. history, and put Trump last. The historians were asked to give every president a score, from zero to 100. Abraham Lincoln topped the list with an average score ... Read Article

"In Leibniz's sense, a ratio sufficiens, a sufficient reason, isn't at all a ground capable of supporting a being so that it doesn't straightaway fall into nothing. A sufficient reason is one that reaches and offers to beings that which puts them in the position of fulfilling their full essence, that is, perfectio. " (Heidegger, The Principle of Reason, 71) In Western Philosophy "Will" became an important issue following Kant. Kant noticed that out of Freedom the Will unconsciously self-legislates a rule according to which I am responsible for my actions, unlike animals and certain mentally disabled people who are not thought of as personally accountable like we are. Later, Will became identified as the defining feature of beings in general with Schopenhauer and Nietzsche (along with eternal return) As with all previous philosophers Schopenhauer wanted to know the Being question, what is the ultimate foundation of all things that beings "point" toward.  Nowadays many would say that is the p ... Read Article

During the presidential debate between Trump and Harris, Donald Trump made a comment about crime in the United States: …all over the world crime is down. All over the world except here. Crime here is up and through the roof. … Crime in this country is through the roof. https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/harris-trump-presidential-debate-transcript/story?id=113560542 (Viewed 10-11-24) In my Part 1 post on this subject, I showed that Trump was implying the following claim: The rate of VIOLENT crime has drastically increased under the Biden administration AS COMPARED TO the rate of VIOLENT crime under the Trump administration. I also showed that this was a BIG FAT LIE by Donald Trump, despite the protestations of the legal scholar Jonathan Turley in his editorial in The Hill. Because the crime rate data both from the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program and from the National Crime Victimization Surveys conducted by the DOJ clearly indicate that the above claim by Trump was a ... Read Article

Previous Posts in this Series: (1/4) Christianity, A Question of Reasoning: The Continental/Analytic Philosophy Divide (Part 2 of 4) Christianity, A Question of Reasoning: The Continental/Analytic Philosophy Divide (Part 3/4, AFTERWORD) Christianity, A Question of Reasoning: The Christ Myth Theory and the Lord’s Supper (Part4/4 Appendix) Christianity, A Question of Reasoning: The Christ Myth Theory and the Lord’s Supper Last Time: Does Literary Imitation Suggest Christ Never Existed? Now, the Conclusion: Do the imitations in writing (typologies) the New Testament like Jesus as the New Moses in Matthew mean the gospel narratives are simply invented out of whole cloth, or do they contain a trace of the historical Jesus in them?  Probably both, and it is very tricky to pinpoint where on that spectrum a real story may reside.  So, McGrath notes some of the proposed typologies are very poor fits and so not the kind of story you would invent out of whole cloth if your primary int ... Read Article

Washington (CNN) —  Former President Donald Trump is littering his public remarks with fictional stories. ... the Republican presidential nominee is telling colorful lies that are completely untethered to reality. https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/19/politics/fact-check-donald-trump-fictional-stories Here is LIE #11 from Donald Trump: The jobs revision After the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics announced in August that its annual revision of jobs data found that the economy added about 818,000 fewer jobs than initially reported for the 12 months ending in March, Trump told a story about how the government had been planning to announce this downward revision “after November 5th,” Election Day, but was forced to do so before the election because of “a whistleblower” – “a patriot leaker.” Another fabrication. The Bureau of Labor Statistics regularly releases the preliminary revised data in August, and it had disclosed the precise ... Read Article

It's now more mainstream to acknowledge that the NT writers were rewriting OT scripture to flesh out the biography of Jesus, and so we have Mark create his crucifixion narrative out of Psalms and Isaiah since Paul doesn't record any details. Matthew presents Jesus as the New and greater Moses. Spong had actually written about this for years prior. Mark says “The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ ; as it is written in the prophets.” Mark immediately interprets John the Baptist as a forerunner of the Messiah (a la Elijah in II Kings 1:8). Mark then clothes John similar to Elijah (Mark 1:6. II Kings 1:8.) He then says John ate locusts and wild honey,the food of the wilderness in which Elijah lived (and so on and so on). Dr. Kipp Davis recently noted the Dead Sea Scrolls writers did the same thing to flesh out a biography of their Teacher of Righteousness (who obviously existed) rewriting scripture because they saw their Teacher of Righteousness as realizing them. How did the Christians do it? ... Read Article

Trump is polling well with conservative Christians but is really trying to overcome the problem that conservative Christians often stay at home on election day. ... Read Article