Uncategorized

Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death in Response to Heidegger in “APORIAS” (Part 1)

This will be my last series on Derrida and Death and I will be looking at his book APORIAS. Here’s a little context for making sense of the series: Friedrich Nietzsche discusses ancient Greek “proofs” of the soul’s immortality primarily to critique them as life-denying inventions that paved the way for Christian asceticism. Nietzsche identifies Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death in Response to Heidegger in “APORIAS” (Part 1)

Jacques Derrida and Angelus Silesius in Sauf le nom (Conclusion)

We’ve been thinking about apophasis/negative theology, a way of approaching God without attributing things to him.  This was popularized by the Christian mystic tradition.  Angelus Silesius mentions the heart becoming the Mount of Olives in Book 2, epigram 81 of Cherubinischer Wandersmann (translated as The Cherubinic Wanderer). The original German text reads: “Soll dich des Jacques Derrida and Angelus Silesius in Sauf le nom (Conclusion)

Jacques Derrida and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 4)

We’ve been thinking about negative theology / apophatic theology with Derrida’s Sauf le nom, the idea of characterizing the divine by negating predicates: wise without wisdom, powerful without power.  It is a kind of language/translating.  It is a being-together or gathering together of singularities (46) that is not just that of a subsuming under a Jacques Derrida and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 4)

Jacques Derrida, Friedrich Nietzsche and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 3)

Derrida’s Sauf le nom (Post-Scriptum) begins with a look at apophatic theology (negative theology) and Augustine’s Confessions.  Apophatic theology is the idea that we approach God, not through attribution (e.g., God is all-powerful), but through questioning and negation [“Meister Eckhart cites him often; he often cites the ‘without’ of Saint Augustine, that quasi-negative predication of Jacques Derrida, Friedrich Nietzsche and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 3)

Derrida and Heidegger: Phenomenology vs Deconstruction “Sauf le nom (part 1)”

Heidegger uses the term phenomenology in Hegel’s sense as “uncovering what is hidden” though always already there inconspicuously: making conspicuous. Hegel says the tearing of the sock phenomenalizes the Category of Unity, “as” a lost-Unity. Hegel, in his inaugural address, Heidelberg, 1816, says “The Being of the universe, at first hidden and concealed, has no Derrida and Heidegger: Phenomenology vs Deconstruction “Sauf le nom (part 1)”