atheism & naturalism

American Atheists Billboards and Ridicule of Religious Ideas

Prior to my earlier posts on American Atheists’s billboards, an atheist, whose opinion I respect, mentioned his support for the ads. To paraphrase, his argument was something like this. Religious beliefs should not get special protection from ridicule and doubt. They have had this protection for far too long and this needs to stop. Our American Atheists Billboards and Ridicule of Religious Ideas

American Atheists Doesn’t Speak for This American Atheist

CNN.com this morning reported on the latest billboard ads paid for by American Atheists. Here are the ads. What was the purpose of the ads? Here is Dave Silverman, President of American Atheists. “Presidential conventions are for ideas, not ideology – platforms, not platitudes,” Silverman said. “If a person believes stupid things, we have every American Atheists Doesn’t Speak for This American Atheist

Definition of Friendly Atheist

This is a quick post about the definition of “friendly atheist.” Purdue University Emeritus Professor of Philosophy William Rowe famously coined the terms, “friendly atheist,” “indifferent atheist,” and “unfriendly atheist.”[1] What did he mean by these terms? unfriendly atheist: an atheist who believes no one is justified in believing that the theistic God existsindifferent atheist: Definition of Friendly Atheist

The Implications of Evolutionary Explanations of Religious Belief for Atheism

This is not new, but I just saw for the first time an interesting article by Alan Jacobs entitled, “The Future of Atheism: Damned If You Don’t, Damned If You Don’t.” Jacobs expresses a viewpoint I haven’t seen addressed by other atheists, but it’s one I’ve often thought about myself. if the evolutionary account of The Implications of Evolutionary Explanations of Religious Belief for Atheism