Month: May 2019

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 14: Exposure by Adversaries

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination-of-alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually rose from Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 14: Exposure by Adversaries

The Resurrection of Dr. Sean George – Part 4: Evaluation of Premise (1c)

GEORGE’S ARGUMENT FOR HIS MIRACLE CLAIM In his main web article, Dr. Sean George appears to put forward the following simple argument: 1. Dr. Sean George rose from the dead. (factual claim) A. Only God can cause a person to rise from the dead. (metaphysical claim) THEREFORE: 2. God raised Dr. Sean George from the The Resurrection of Dr. Sean George – Part 4: Evaluation of Premise (1c)

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 13: Inevitable Exposure

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination-of-alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually rose from Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 13: Inevitable Exposure

The Resurrection of Dr. Sean George – Part 2: Littlewood’s Law

Dr. Sean George claims that God raised him from the dead. I have prepared a PowerPoint presentation called “The Resurrection of Sean George” which contains lots of relevant information and skeptical points about Dr. Sean George’s miracle claim.  Here at The Secular Outpost,  I plan to present my main objections to his miracle claim. The The Resurrection of Dr. Sean George – Part 2: Littlewood’s Law

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 12: Hometown Disadvantage?

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination-of-alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually rose from Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 12: Hometown Disadvantage?

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 11: Producing Jesus’ Corpse

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination-of-alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually rose from Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 11: Producing Jesus’ Corpse

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 10: Motivation for Lying

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination-of-alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually rose from Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 10: Motivation for Lying

Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 9: The Character of the Apostles

WHERE WE ARE AT Peter Kreeft raises seven objections against The Conspiracy Theory (hereafter: TCT) in an attempt to disprove that theory, as part of an elimination of alternatives argument for the resurrection of Jesus.  Kreeft thinks that by disproving four skeptical theories, he can show that the Christian theory is true, that Jesus actually Defending the Conspiracy Theory – Part 9: The Character of the Apostles