Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence (ECREE), Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig
In my last post, I offered a Bayesian interpretation of the principle, “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence” (ECREE). William Lane Craig, however, disagrees with ECREE. In a response to philosopher Stephen Law, Craig wrote this. This sounds so commonsensical, doesn’t it? But in fact it is demonstrably false. Probability theorists studying what sort of evidence … Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence (ECREE), Part 2: Is ECREE False? A Reply to William Lane Craig
LINK: Colin McGinn on Atheism
The Spring 2012 issue of Theoretical and Applied Ethics contains a symposium on Ethics, Atheism, and Religion. The lead essay is by Colin McGinn and is followed by responses from Edward Feser, Steve Fuller, Ted Peters, and Robert Sinclair. All the essays can be read online, so go take a look. HT: Edward Feser Your … LINK: Colin McGinn on Atheism
Open Question to Theists: Do You Condone the Use of the Phrase a “Murder of Atheists”?
I just learned about this. Apparently the apologist who runs the site www.truefreethinker.com has described Geisler’s response to The Empty Tomb: Jesus Beyond the Grave as a “murder of atheists.” (See here and here.) To be clear, the author is not calling for the murder of atheists. Rather, he says, I am employing the term … Open Question to Theists: Do You Condone the Use of the Phrase a “Murder of Atheists”?
Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence (ECREE), Part 1: The Bayesian Interpretation of ECREE
If you read this blog, chances are that you very familiar with the slogan, popularized by the late Carl Sagan, that “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” What I want to do is to offer a Bayesian interpretation and defense of that slogan. In order to make this a ‘self-contained’ post, I will need to repeat … Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence (ECREE), Part 1: The Bayesian Interpretation of ECREE
LINK: Leah Libresco of Unequally Yoked Converts from Atheism to Catholicism
I had never heard of her before this, but Leah Libresco of the blog Unequally Yoked has converted from atheism to Catholicism. It appears a big factor in her conversion was her belief that the Moral Law is a person. I hope that nontheists will (1) not commit the “No True Scotsman” fallacy and deny … LINK: Leah Libresco of Unequally Yoked Converts from Atheism to Catholicism
LINK: Does the threat of a highway to Hell deter a problem child? New study shows the complications of belief and crime
LINK Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)
LINK: How Dare You Threaten Me with Your Harmless Opinion?
LINK Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)
Can Theists Be Moral?
That’s a pretty silly question, isn’t it? I would argue that it is about as silly as the question, “Can Atheists Be Moral?” Even fundamentalist Christian philosophers grant that atheists can know moral principles and behave according to those principles. If someone wishes to deny that theists or atheists can have morals, it seems the … Can Theists Be Moral?
LINK: Daniels on Farrah: Atheists Can’t Be Real Americans
Mike Daniels at Secular News Daily has an excellent discussion of Farrah’s anti-atheist diatribe. Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)
LINK: Why The “Minimal Facts” Model is Unpersuasive
This is not new, but I just stumbled across this. It’s a very interesting summary and critique of the “minimal facts” approach to arguing evidentially for the Resurrection. LINK Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)