Uncategorized

Jacques Derrida and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 4)

We’ve been thinking about negative theology / apophatic theology with Derrida’s Sauf le nom, the idea of characterizing the divine by negating predicates: wise without wisdom, powerful without power.  It is a kind of language/translating.  It is a being-together or gathering together of singularities (46) that is not just that of a subsuming under a Jacques Derrida and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 4)

Jacques Derrida, Friedrich Nietzsche and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 3)

Derrida’s Sauf le nom (Post-Scriptum) begins with a look at apophatic theology (negative theology) and Augustine’s Confessions.  Apophatic theology is the idea that we approach God, not through attribution (e.g., God is all-powerful), but through questioning and negation [“Meister Eckhart cites him often; he often cites the ‘without’ of Saint Augustine, that quasi-negative predication of Jacques Derrida, Friedrich Nietzsche and Søren Kierkegaard in “Sauf le nom” (part 3)

Derrida and Heidegger: Phenomenology vs Deconstruction “Sauf le nom (part 1)”

Heidegger uses the term phenomenology in Hegel’s sense as “uncovering what is hidden” though always already there inconspicuously: making conspicuous. Hegel says the tearing of the sock phenomenalizes the Category of Unity, “as” a lost-Unity. Hegel, in his inaugural address, Heidelberg, 1816, says “The Being of the universe, at first hidden and concealed, has no Derrida and Heidegger: Phenomenology vs Deconstruction “Sauf le nom (part 1)”

Jacques Derrida and Passions

I’ve been thinking about Jacques Derrida and deconstruction in previous posts, so I’d like to contrast Derrida with Heidegger briefly “In order to understand, Heidegger says, one must see phenomenologically. He thus invites us to the first exercise of phenomenological “kindergarten.” To tear apart [zer-reissen] means: to tear into two parts, to separate: to make Jacques Derrida and Passions

Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death: Conclusion of The Gift of Death chapter 3-4 with Heidegger, Derrida

Heidegger talks about the passivity and receptivity of essential thinking, not something the result of your effort.  In German this is “Es Gibt,” “there is” or literally “it gives.”  For example, you might try in futility for hours to solve a problem when suddenly “it comes to you.”  Derrida’s analysis in “The Gift of Death” Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death: Conclusion of The Gift of Death chapter 3-4 with Heidegger, Derrida

End of Year Post. Announcing My Fourth and Final Essay on the Historical Paul and Prof Nina Livesey

One of the striking things about Paul’s letters is they sound like Papal missives or decrees. Paul was a self-made man from Tarsus and a self-proclaimed apostle. But his long and weighty letters make him sound like a Roman provincial administrator. In fact, the letters themselves depict Paul as such an administrator who makes the End of Year Post. Announcing My Fourth and Final Essay on the Historical Paul and Prof Nina Livesey

Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death: The Gift of Death chapter 2(b) with Heidegger, Derrida, and Artificial Intelligence

Heidegger notes in the history of philosophy as metaphysics from Plato to Nietzsche the central “world” or context the questions are being interrogated in are that of Being, which made scientific reasoning possible. The Greek word for Being, ousia, which first became a technical term in Aristotle originally meant estate, the general sphere or network Jacques Derrida and the Philosophy of Death: The Gift of Death chapter 2(b) with Heidegger, Derrida, and Artificial Intelligence