Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted
<!– /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-unhide:no; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:””; margin:0cm; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-fareast-font-family:”Times New Roman”; mso-no-proof:yes;} .MsoChpDefault {mso-style-type:export-only; mso-default-props:yes; font-size:10.0pt; mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page WordSection1 {size:612.0pt 792.0pt; margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; mso-header-margin:36.0pt; mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; mso-paper-source:0;} div.WordSection1 {page:WordSection1;} –> <!– /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Cambria Math”; panose-1:2 4 5 3 … Plantinga’s Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism refuted
Gregory Dawes: Religion, Science, and Explanation
Abstract: A recent legal ruling in the United States regarding ‘intelligent design’ (ID) argued that ID is not science because it invokes a supernatural agent. It therefore cannot be taught in public schools. But the important philosophical question is not whether ID invokes a supernatural agent; it is whether it meets the standards we expect … Gregory Dawes: Religion, Science, and Explanation
Atheists As “Other”: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society
Penny Edgell, Joseph Gerteis, and Douglas Hartmann. “Atheists As ‘Other’: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society.” American Sociological Review April 2006 71: 211–234, doi:10.1177/000312240607100203. Abstract: Despite the declining salience of divisions among religious groups, the boundary between believers and nonbelievers in America remains strong. This article examines the limits of Americans’ acceptance of … Atheists As “Other”: Moral Boundaries and Cultural Membership in American Society
Stephen Parrish: God and Objectivism: A Critique of Objectivist Philosophy of Religion
“I will examine what Objectivists, both old and new, have written about God and subject it to critical analysis. My conclusion will be that Objectivists have not only failed to keep up with the work of contemporary philosophers of religion, but that their work is marred by logical fallacies, especially begging the question. Philosophical naturalism … Stephen Parrish: God and Objectivism: A Critique of Objectivist Philosophy of Religion
ex-apologist: J.L. Schellenberg’s New Website
LINK HT: ex-apologist
ex-apologist: Lovering on Immoral Theistic Belief
Lovering, Rob. “On the Morality of Having Faith that God Exists“, Sophia 51:1 (2012), 17-30. Abstract: Many theists who identify themselves with the Abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) maintain that it is perfectly acceptable to have faith that God exists. In this paper, I argue that, when believing that God exists will affect others, it … ex-apologist: Lovering on Immoral Theistic Belief
Doug Geivett: Paranoid Atheists, Take Note
I discovered this old post on Christian philosopher Doug Geivett’s blog. He mentions a book by John Mickelthwaite and Adrian Wooldridge, God Is Back: How the Revival of Religion Is Changing the World. According to Geivett, the book “is a kind of protest against the excesses of paranoid atheism.” From the description, the book does … Doug Geivett: Paranoid Atheists, Take Note
Guy Kahane: Value and Philosophical Possibility
Abstract: Much seems to be at stake in metaphysical questions about God, free will or morality. One thing that could be at stake is the value of the universe we inhabit—how good or bad it is. We can think of competing philosophical positions as describing possibilities, ways the world might turn out to be, and … Guy Kahane: Value and Philosophical Possibility
Matt McCormick’s NPR Interview
A great interview from NPR.
Keith Burgess-Jackson: Alvin Plantinga on the New Atheists
As an atheist philosopher, Keith Burgess-Jackson is not impressed by Richard Dawkins’s use of contempt to attempt to win “converts” from theism to atheism. LINK


