As is the case with new scholarship like Nina Livesey’s recent book on Paul’s letters as pseudonymous, it sometimes involves for the reader a back and forth with implications trying to appropriate the new materials. I originally tried to challenge a late date of Luke-Acts with Dennis MacDonald with Vergil’s Aeneid, but I don’t think that holds any more. So, the dating I have now is “Q” as the earliest source, and then post Bar Kokhba pseudonymous Paul, and then the traditional order, post Bar Kokhba of Mark, Matthew, Luke-Acts, and then John. If Goodacre and Carrier are right that there is no Q, then everything seems post revolt. I’ve added to the posts where I modified earlier thoughts:

Easter Post: Dating the Gospels

Easter Post 2/2: Scribal Galilee by Sarah Rollens

Review-  The Letters of Paul in their Roman Literary Context: Reassessing Apostolic Authorship by Nina E. Livesey

The Late Date of the Gospels

(2/2) The Late Date of the Gospels

(Conclusion) The Late Dates of the Gospels

(4) The Late Date of the Gospels: Supplement