Uncategorized

CONCLUSION: Taking A Middle Position Between Crossan And Ehrman On Jesus

Regarding a moral influence interpretation of the cross that exposes/makes conspicuous guilt rather than wipe it clean, we read adapted from Rohr: In the Franciscan view, God did not need to be paid in order to love and forgive God’s own creation. Love cannot be bought by some “necessary sacrifice”; if it could, it would CONCLUSION: Taking A Middle Position Between Crossan And Ehrman On Jesus

Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 5

 Anthology co-editor Keith Augustine has kindly provided a response to the Hasker review I mentioned previously.  He writes:  Incidentally, Hasker is interestingly wrong about some things. For example, he writes: “However, they [my coauthor of chapter 10 & I] go well beyond the dependence thesis, arguing that brain function is not merely a necessary condition but in fact Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 5

Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 4

I wanted to share a helpful review of The Myth of an Afterlife by William Hasker here: https://ndpr.nd.edu/reviews/the-myth-of-an-afterlife-the-case-against-life-after-death/ There is a lot to chew on here, but I just wanted to address a couple points: 1 Perhaps even more striking is the omission of any consideration of theism as a serious option. This omission is impor­tant Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 4

Why This Skeptic is Secular Blogging — It’s a (Fairly) Long Story

Why This Skeptic is Secular Blogging – It’s a (Fairly) Long Story My religious history that led to yours truly becoming a skeptical intellect doing research and commentary is complex. And rather interesting. Not my father’s side of our (rather dysfunctional) nuclear family. Indiana Hoosier from corn country, a Cold War United Methodist Republican to Why This Skeptic is Secular Blogging — It’s a (Fairly) Long Story

Washed In The Blood Of Christ

The idea of being washed by the blood of Jesus is popular among conservative Christians who adhere to the “paying our sin debt” interpretation of Jesus’s death.  Recently, Jessica Brodie (mostly from sources outside Paul or the 4 Gospels) summarized it this way: Dr. James McGrath has pointed out the flaw in this methodology where Washed In The Blood Of Christ

Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 3

No Mental Life after Brain Death: The Argument from the Neural Localization of Mental Functions Gualtiero Piccinini and Sonya Bahar  (Martin, Michael; Augustine, Keith. The Myth of an Afterlife . Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Kindle Edition.) For today’s post on The Myth of an Afterlife, I wanted to unpack some thoughts from Piccinini and Bahar’s chapter Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 3

Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 2

Today I wanted to think a little about the difference between the kinds of lenses theological hypotheses provide in comparison with secular lenses in science and even literature.  In his introduction to the book, Augustine points out that regarding the secular framework for viewing death: “Because we are built from the same flesh and blood Blogging Through Augustine/Martin’s Anthology “The Myth Of An Afterlife” Part 2

The Law Written On Our Hearts

It is sometimes said that the only difference between Paul and the Jerusalem bunch on Jesus is that Paul didn’t think gentile converts needed to be circumcised (become fully Jewish).  This hardly makes Paul historically interesting, and seems to miss a key distinction. In previous posts I talked about Jeremiah’s prophecy that the law would The Law Written On Our Hearts