books of interest

Gary Habermas is the Leading Defender of the Resurrection of Jesus

I have long thought that Dr. Gary Habermas was the best defender of the alleged resurrection of Jesus. The recent publication of two large volumes by Habermas on this issue demonstrates that my previous opinion was correct. No 21st-century skeptic can reasonably claim to have cast serious doubt on the resurrection of Jesus without dealing Gary Habermas is the Leading Defender of the Resurrection of Jesus

Careful Analysis of More Objections to the Swoon Theory: INDEX

I have previously done a careful analysis of nine objections against the Swoon Theory presented by the Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (1994; hereafter: HCA): More recently, I have done a careful analysis of six more objections to the Swoon Theory presented by other Christian apologists, objections Careful Analysis of More Objections to the Swoon Theory: INDEX

Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #15 (Jesus’ Wounds)

WHERE WE ARE The Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli presented nine objections against the Swoon Theory in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in 1994). I have carefully analyzed those nine objections and then carefully evaluated them. I concluded that each of those nine objections against the Swoon Theory FAIL. So, Kreeft and Tacelli FAILED to Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #15 (Jesus’ Wounds)

Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #14 (Last Words)

WHERE WE ARE The Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli presented nine objections against the Swoon Theory in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in 1994). I have carefully analyzed those nine objections and then carefully evaluated them. I concluded that each of those nine objections against the Swoon Theory FAIL. So, Kreeft and Tacelli FAILED to Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #14 (Last Words)

Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #13 (Other Writers)

WHERE WE ARE The Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli presented nine objections against the Swoon Theory in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in 1994). I have carefully analyzed those nine objections and then carefully evaluated them. I concluded that each of those nine objections against the Swoon Theory FAIL. So, Kreeft and Tacelli FAILED to Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #13 (Other Writers)

Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #12 (Paul’s Conversion)

WHERE WE ARE The Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli presented nine objections against the Swoon Theory in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in 1994). I have carefully analyzed those nine objection and then carefully evaluated them. I concluded that each of those nine objections against the Swoon Theory FAIL. So, Kreeft and Tacelli FAILED to Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #12 (Paul’s Conversion)

Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #11 (Deceptive Jesus)

OBJECTION #11 AGAINST THE SWOON THEORY In his book The Son Rises (originally published in 1981, I will use the re-published edition from 2000; hereafter: TSR) the Christian apologist William Craig makes an objection against the Swoon Theory that does not correspond to any of the nine objections raised by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #11 (Deceptive Jesus)