LINK: Existence of Atheists Offends Christians
LINK I find it difficult to find fault with the logic in the second paragraph at that link: “Since there is absolutely nothing even remotely offensive about this billboard, the inevitable conclusion is that many Christians are offended by the fact that there are atheists. If that isn’t bigotry and hatred, I’m not sure what … LINK: Existence of Atheists Offends Christians
“God Particle” Discovery Means Woes for Atheists?
Check this out: https://i.imgur.com/Y69cF.png According to some Tweeters, the recent (probable) discovery of the Higgs Boson (unfortunately tagged “The God Particle” by physicist Leon Lederman) has some people once again writing obituaries for atheism. Of course, it seems unlikely that these particular individuals have advanced degrees in physics, philosophy, or theology, so their pronouncements should … “God Particle” Discovery Means Woes for Atheists?
LINK: Colin McGinn on Atheism
The Spring 2012 issue of Theoretical and Applied Ethics contains a symposium on Ethics, Atheism, and Religion. The lead essay is by Colin McGinn and is followed by responses from Edward Feser, Steve Fuller, Ted Peters, and Robert Sinclair. All the essays can be read online, so go take a look. HT: Edward Feser
A Brief Comment on Terminology
The purpose of this post is just to define terms used in my series on evidential arguments for naturalism. Before discussing specific arguments for and against atheism, I think it would be useful to define some terms. In doing so I will adopt the definitions put forth by Professor Theodore M. Drange in his excellent … A Brief Comment on Terminology
Index: Evidential Arguments for Naturalism
Preliminary Issues Evidential Arguments for Naturalism
The Evidential Argument from the History of Science (AHS)
Informal Statement of the Argument If there is a single theme unifying the history of science, it is that naturalistic explanations work. The history of science contains numerous examples of naturalistic explanations replacing supernatural ones and no examples of supernatural explanations replacing naturalistic ones. Indeed, naturalistic explanations have been so successful that even most scientific … The Evidential Argument from the History of Science (AHS)
LINK: Draper on Naturalism, Theism, and the Burden of Proof
http://www.newappsblog.com/2012/05/paul-drapers-burden-of-proof-for-theists.html HT: Ex-Apologist
Gervais and Norenzayan: Analytical Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief
Abstract: Scientific interest in the cognitive underpinnings of religious belief has grown in recent years. However, to date, little experimental research has focused on the cognitive processes that may promote religious disbelief. The present studies apply a dual-process model of cognitive processing to this problem, testing the hypothesis that analytic processing promotes religious disbelief. Individual … Gervais and Norenzayan: Analytical Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief
Gervais: Finding the Faithless: Perceived Atheist Prevalence Reduces Anti-Atheist Prejudice
Abstract:Although prejudice is typically positively related to relative outgroup size, four studies found converging evidence that perceived atheist prevalence reduces anti-atheist prejudice. Study 1 demonstrated that anti-atheist prejudice among religious believers is reduced in countries in which atheists are especially prevalent. Study 2 demonstrated that perceived atheist prevalence is negatively associated with anti-atheist prejudice. Study … Gervais: Finding the Faithless: Perceived Atheist Prevalence Reduces Anti-Atheist Prejudice
Comforting Illusions: Reply to Steve Hays
Hays writes: Militant atheists deem it their duty to disabuse Christians of their faith. Militant atheists think Christian theology is false, and they also think it’s morally wrong to believe falsehood. I guess I am not a militant atheist. (As an aside, why is it common practice to refer to some atheists as “militant” or … Comforting Illusions: Reply to Steve Hays
