Skip to the content
The Secular Frontier

The Secular Frontier

The Internet Infidels Blog
☰
  • Home
  • Our Books
  • Our Debates
  • Arguments for Naturalism
  • Archive Index
  • Join Us
  • About Us
Secular Web: Infidels Blog Kids Forum Portal
Support the Internet Infidels
A small donation will help us continue to do great things for the cause of secularism, humanism, and naturalism.
Donation Options
Sponsors
Beyond Belief
Eddie Tabash
Support the Secular Web

LINK: Why The “Minimal Facts” Model is Unpersuasive

Jeffery Jay Lowder | June 18, 2012

This is not new, but I just stumbled across this. It’s a very interesting summary and critique of the “minimal facts” approach to arguing evidentially for the Resurrection.

LINK

Christianity, links, resurrection | Comments

Post navigation

[← Basic Structure of My Evidential Arguments]
[LINK: Daniels on Farrah: Atheists Can’t Be Real Americans →]

Recent Posts

  • Appendix: Example of DOET Circular Questioning at the Grade 5 Level
  • DOET PHILOSOPHY REVERSAL: I’m Not Trying to Prove my Philosophy with Math
  • DOET (Do-It) Thinking Dedication Page for the Intellectually Impatient
  • Welcome to Secular Frontier!
  • Just DOET Thinking!
  • The Death of the God of Leibniz: Deconstruction in a Nuthouse
  • (Afterword) What is the Difference between God (Infinite Mind) and Person (Finite Mind) in German Philosophical Thought?
  • (Conclusion) What is the Difference between God (Infinite Mind) and Person (Finite Mind) in German Philosophical Thought?
  • (2/2) What is the Difference between God (Infinite Mind) and Person (Finite Mind) in German Philosophical Thought?
  • What is the Difference between God (Infinite Mind) and Person (Finite Mind) in German Philosophical Thought?

  • Home
  • Terms of Service
  • Comment Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Join Us
  • About Us
© 2026 The Secular Web