Month: November 2025

(2/2) What’s the Point of the Bible: Causing Anagnorisis in the Reader

Last time I talked about the twofold purpose of the New Testament and Christ’s death (i) as payment for our sin fine/penalty, and (ii) seeing yourself in those guilty of God’s beloved (agapetos) messenger Christ’s wrongful death, which breaks the spell that the evil powerful entity Sin has you under so as to open your (2/2) What’s the Point of the Bible: Causing Anagnorisis in the Reader

What’s the Point of the Bible?

I talked previously about a two-fold understanding of salvation from sin in Paul’s letter to the Romans, one of a substitutionary atonement paying a penalty for your transgressions to avert God’s wrath, and by contrast a moral influence cross where seeing ourselves in those who killed God’s especially beloved Jesus breaks the spell the powerful What’s the Point of the Bible?

New Published Article: The Quest for the Historical Paul with Nina Livesey (Part 3/4: Paul and the Gospel of John)

The Quest for the Historical Paul (Part C) The modern quest for the historical Paul, determining who the apostle Paul was and what he said, is in an important way borne out of a real peculiarity in our New Testament sources.  On the One hand, we have the authentic letters of Paul that scholars see New Published Article: The Quest for the Historical Paul with Nina Livesey (Part 3/4: Paul and the Gospel of John)

The Meaning of Life Through Death

I remember being very impressed (as a disillusioned philosophy student, lol) in finding Nietzsche’s “Human All Too Human” 399 very apt: “That maturity is reached is manifested in the fact that one no longer goes to where the rarest roses of knowledge grow among the thorniest hedgerows but is satisfied with the field and meadow because life is The Meaning of Life Through Death

AFTERWORD: Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

Regarding the historicity (being in history) of Jesus, the convergence of multiple lines of evidence is very important in historical assessment and evaluation. I gave the example of multiple lines of evidence converging on the idea the Jewish elite were seen as responsible for the death of the historical Jesus, e.g., it makes sense Mark AFTERWORD: Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

EVALUATION: Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)” 

In these posts, I’ve presented some ideas that have come to mind about the first part of Carrier’s book. The methodological program is not radical at all, but very much in line with other disciplines trying to make their judgments grounded. Carrier asks how we move beyond historical judgments that are just rooted in “gut EVALUATION: Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)” 

(Part 7) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)” – Hermeneutics/Deconstruction and Triangulation: Did Jesus Exist?

Hermeneutics is the idea that we can generate the meaning/sense of a text by considering individual elements as signs that point to or express a larger context, and the context is made manifest in the element.  So, Van Gogh’s peasant shoes might express a world of abject poverty and endless toil to which they belong: (Part 7) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)” – Hermeneutics/Deconstruction and Triangulation: Did Jesus Exist?

(Part 6) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

Last time we looked at Carrier’s approach and found it to be a very appropriate one.  Judgements, whether educational judgements or historical ones or whatever, are made according to criteria that have a qualitative and quantitative dimension.  Making this explicit is important because we want to get beyond “gut feeling” judgments like “this feels like (Part 6) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

(Part 5) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

There is a current push, in all disciplines really, to push toward reliability of conclusions, showing your reasoning is based on sound logic. For example, we want to be able to explain why a child received a B grade in Social Studies so that we don’t simply claim the child’s project felt like a “B” (Part 5) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”

(Part 4) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)” 

In this chapter, one thing that caught my eye was Carrier rejecting the Q source as a supporter of Jesus’ existence.  He writes: One of the most ineffectual versions of this approach is to defend the historicity of Jesus on the basis of non-existent sources, like ‘Q’ or ‘M’ or ‘L’ or the ‘Signs Gospel’, (Part 4) Blogging Through Richard Carrier’s new book “The Obsolete Paradigm of a Historical Jesus (2025)”