Month: January 2024

Kipp Davis and James, the Brother of the Lord

The James the Brother of the Lord passage in Paul has long been the bane of mythicists, because if Paul met Jesus’s brother, then Jesus existed. At 9:00 PT prof Kipp Davis will be responding to Godless Engineer’s mythicist thoughts on the passage. Check it out: Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)

Is Sex Binary?

Richard Dawkins shared this interesting talk by Dr. Colin Wright, which is important for such issues as biological males participating in women’s sports. Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)

The Rise of the NONES

The rapid, unprecedented growth of the “nones” continues apace. The nonreligious are now larger than any single religious group in America, and they’ve become the majority in several states. See Article Here Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)

Habermas & Licona on the Swoon Theory

THE QUESTION AT ISSUE In their book The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (published in 2004), Gary Habermas and Michael Licona present three objections against the Swoon Theory, on pages 99 through 103. My Christian friend David Diaz, however, disagrees with the above claim: Habermas and Licona are NOT writing about the “Swoon Theory,” Habermas & Licona on the Swoon Theory

21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 4: Gary Habermas & Michael Licona

WHERE WE ARE I am in the process of reviewing objections to the Swoon Theory found in four books published by Christian apologists in the 21st century. I am trying to determine how many of these objections correspond to the nine objections against the Swoon Theory raised by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in 21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 4: Gary Habermas & Michael Licona

21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 3: Sean & Josh McDowell

WHERE WE ARE I am in the process of reviewing objections to the Swoon Theory found in four books published by Christian apologists in the 21st century. I am trying to determine how many of these objections correspond to the nine objections against the Swoon Theory raised by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their 21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 3: Sean & Josh McDowell

21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 2: Norman Geisler & Frank Turek

WHERE WE ARE I have carefully analyzed and evaluated the nine objections that Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli present against the Swoon Theory in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (hereafter: HCA), which was published in 1994. I have concluded that all nine objections FAIL because they are BAD ARGUMENTS. My Christian friend David Diaz suggested 21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 2: Norman Geisler & Frank Turek