Let E be some piece of evidence and T be theism. Now consider the following argument.
E1 favors T.
E2 favors T.
En favors T.
Therefore, T is probably true.
(Aside: You could swap out N=naturalism for T and the same fallacy would apply.)
Can you spot the fallacy? If you’re a philosopher, please do NOT respond in the combox.
This article is archived.