Skip to the content
The Secular Frontier

The Secular Frontier

The Internet Infidels Blog
☰
  • Home
  • Our Books
  • Our Debates
  • Arguments for Naturalism
  • Archive Index
  • Join Us
  • About Us
Secular Web Portal Secular Frontier IIDB

Amoral Atheism Part 2

Jeffery Jay Lowder | May 29, 2014

Physics cannot justify why anything is morally right or wrong. No one says that is a defect of physics because that’s not what physics is about.

Like physics, atheism is also not about morality. So why should it be a defect of atheism that it cannot justify why anything is morally right or wrong?

    metaethics, moral argument, nontheistic metaethics, theistic metaethics | Comments

    Post navigation

    [← Round Table Discussion on Theism, Naturalism, and Evidence (video)]
    [Craig’s “Historical Evidence” for the Death of Jesus – Part 2 →]

    Sponsors

    Support the Secular Web
    Great Debate, The
    Secular Coalition for America

    Recent Posts

    • Robert M Price Weighs in on Prof Nina Livesey and the Historical Paul Debate
    • Craig vs. Spinoza: Craig’s Objections to Spinoza’s Second Objection against Miracles
    • Did Paul Exist and the Authenticity of the Pauline Letters: Debate Nina Livesey vs Bruce Chilton
    • Craig vs. Spinoza: A Big Problem for Belief in Miracles
    • Five Draft Chapters from: Thinking Critically about the Resurrection of Jesus
    © 2025 The Secular Web