How NOT to Argue for Agnosticism
I recently purchased a couple of introductory books on the philosophy of religion. One of the books is by a contemporary analytic philosopher of religion, Richard M. Gale, titled: On The Philosophy Of Religion (Thompson Wadsworth, 2007). The other is by a philosopher named Gary Cox, who is not a specialist in philosophy of religion: The … How NOT to Argue for Agnosticism
Richard Gale: “The Kalam Cosmological Argument Isn’t Taken Seriously”
“Some defenders of the Kalam Argument supplement their conceptually-based argument against the universe having had an infinite past existence with contingent facts from modern Big Bang cosmology that holds there to be a point singularity at some past time, which they then gratuitously interpret as the point in time when the universe came into existence. … Richard Gale: “The Kalam Cosmological Argument Isn’t Taken Seriously”