Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #3 (Blood and Water)
WHERE WE ARE Careful argument evaluation is the heart and soul of critical thinking. But in order to do a careful evaluation of an argument, one must first have a clear understanding of the argument that is to be evaluated. Careful argument analysis is usually required in order to obtain a clear understanding of an … Careful Analysis of Objections to the Swoon Theory: Objection #3 (Blood and Water)
Careful Analysis of Objections Against the Swoon Theory: Objection #2 (Break Their Legs)
WHERE WE ARE Careful argument evaluation is the heart and soul of critical thinking. But in order to do a careful evaluation of an argument, one must first have a clear understanding of the argument that is to be evaluated. Careful argument analysis is usually required in order to obtain a clear understanding of an … Careful Analysis of Objections Against the Swoon Theory: Objection #2 (Break Their Legs)
Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 42: Premise (B) of Objection #8
WHERE WE ARE Although Objection #8 (Where Did Jesus Go?) as presented by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (hereafter: HCA) was DEAD ON ARRIVAL because of the embarrassing blunder that a key premise of their argument was obviously FALSE, we have revised and improved that premise so that it … Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 42: Premise (B) of Objection #8
Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 41: Repairing a Key Premise of Objection #8
WHERE WE ARE We are in the process of analyzing and evaluating Objection #8 (Where Did Jesus Go?) by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli against the Swoon Theory, from their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (hereafter: HCA). This is the final objection against the Swoon Theory by Kreeft and Tacelli that I will be critically examining. … Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 41: Repairing a Key Premise of Objection #8
Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 40: A Key Premise of Objection #8
OBJECTION #8 (WHERE DID JESUS GO?) Here is Objection #8 (Where Did Jesus Go?) against the Swoon Theory as presented by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (HCA): If Jesus awoke from a swoon, where did he go? Think this through: you have a living body to deal with now, not a … Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 40: A Key Premise of Objection #8
21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 5: Conclusions
WHERE WE ARE In this series, I have been reviewing objections to the Swoon Theory found in four books published by Christian apologists in the 21st century. I am trying to determine how many of these objections correspond to the nine objections against the Swoon Theory raised by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in … 21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 5: Conclusions
Christian Apologists are UNCLEAR about the Swoon Theory – Part 2: More Definitions
WHERE WE ARE In the first post of this series, I showed that the definition of “swoon theory” implied by the Christian apologists Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (1994) was WRONG because it was too simple and too broad. I also showed that the definition of “swoon theory” implied … Christian Apologists are UNCLEAR about the Swoon Theory – Part 2: More Definitions
Christian Apologists are UNCLEAR about the Swoon Theory
No Christian apologist has made a strong and solid case for the resurrection of Jesus. One reason for this is that no Christian apologist has made a strong and solid case AGAINST the Swoon Theory, which is one skeptical alternative to the Christian view that Jesus died on the cross, was buried in a stone … Christian Apologists are UNCLEAR about the Swoon Theory
Habermas & Licona on the Swoon Theory
THE QUESTION AT ISSUE In their book The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (published in 2004), Gary Habermas and Michael Licona present three objections against the Swoon Theory, on pages 99 through 103. My Christian friend David Diaz, however, disagrees with the above claim: Habermas and Licona are NOT writing about the “Swoon Theory,” … Habermas & Licona on the Swoon Theory
21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 4: Gary Habermas & Michael Licona
WHERE WE ARE I am in the process of reviewing objections to the Swoon Theory found in four books published by Christian apologists in the 21st century. I am trying to determine how many of these objections correspond to the nine objections against the Swoon Theory raised by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli in their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (published in … 21st Century Christian Apologists on the Swoon Theory – Part 4: Gary Habermas & Michael Licona