arguments for atheism

LINK: Matt McCormick’s Atheism Blog

His blog isn’t new, but I just discovered it and wanted to mention it here. LINK For those of you who do not know who Matt McCormick is, he is an atheist philosopher of religion at California State University at Sacramento. Your name Your email Subject Your message (optional)

The Evidential Argument from Mind-Brain Dependence: A Reply to Bilbo

In my response to Victor Reppert’s anti-naturalistic argument from pain, I stated that a more specific fact (consciousness is dependent upon the physical brain) about consciousness is antecedently more likely on naturalism than on theism. Bilbo provided several feedback messages in response to this claim. As I read him, he thinks the argument is no The Evidential Argument from Mind-Brain Dependence: A Reply to Bilbo

The Possibility of Proving the Non-Existence of Something

In a recent blog entry, theistic philosopher William Vallicella criticizes a statement made by psychologist Paul Vitz, in which Vitz asserted that it is “intrinsically impossible” to “prove the non-existence of anything.” As Vallicelli correctly points out: “But surely there are things whose nonexistence can be proven. The nonexistence of a round square can be The Possibility of Proving the Non-Existence of Something