Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 4: Michael Martin’s Expanded Version
A. The Arguments Formulated In chapter 13 of Atheism: A Philosophical Justification, Michael Martin argues that Salmon’s arguments can be expanded to provide a powerful case for atheism: If Salmon’s arguments concerning the unique properties of God are restated and expanded, they provide a powerful inductive case for positive atheism in the narrow sense. The … Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 4: Michael Martin’s Expanded Version
Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 3: Assessment of Salmon’s Argument(s)
Two general comments. First, I am uninterested in matters of Salmon’s interpretation of Hume, so I’m going to skip over that issue in its entirety.[10] Second, it seems to me that the idea of using a frequency interpretation of probability for assigning probability values to ultimate metaphysical posits is fundamentally misguided;[11] I think the epistemic … Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 3: Assessment of Salmon’s Argument(s)
Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 2: Salmon’s Argument(s) Formulated
As I read him, Salmon presents multiple arguments against the design hypothesis. Let us consider the logical form of each argument in turn. Note that all of the argument labels are mine; Salmon does not label any of his arguments in his essay. A. The Argument Against an Unspecified Intelligent Designer This is the argument … Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 2: Salmon’s Argument(s) Formulated
Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 1
Wesley Salmon Since Michael Martin begins his chapter on atheistic teleological arguments (ATAs) with a discussion of Wesley Salmon’s 1978 article, “Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume’s Dialogues,” let us review Salmon’s argument.[1] My goal now is simply to figure out what Salmon’s argument is; I will defer an assessment of Salmon’s argument … Atheistic Teleological Arguments, Part 1
Atheistic Teleological Arguments: Index
I first learned about so-called “atheistic teleological arguments” (ATAs) when I read Michael Martin’s Atheism: A Philosophical Justification in 1995. When I first read Martin’s chapter on ATAs, I found them very puzzling. Since 1995 I have thought about them off and on but without investing the time to really understand them. Since I have … Atheistic Teleological Arguments: Index
The Evidential Argument from Scale — Index
The purpose this post is to provide an index for all Secular Outpost articles regarding the evidential argument from scale (AS) for naturalism. “The Argument from Scale Revisited” by Jeffery Jay Lowder Part 1: a critical assessment of Nicholas Everitt’s version of the AS, as formulated in his book The Non-Existence of God Part 2: … The Evidential Argument from Scale — Index
The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 4
In this version, I am going to make a subtle switch in the emphasis of the argument from the scale of the universe to the fact that humans don’t have a privileged position (spatially or temporally) in the universe.[1] Preliminaries B: The Relevant Background Evidence 1. A physical universe, which operates according to natural laws … The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 4
The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 3
In part 2 of my series on the evidential Argument from Scale (AS), I concluded that neither metaphysical naturalism nor theism explain the evidence regarding the scale of the universe, if we restrict our background knowledge to the two propositions I identified as B1 and B2. In this post, I want to explore the effect of … The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 3
The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 2
Originally published on 14-Nov-11; updated 20-Nov-11 In part 1 of my series on the evidential Argument from Scale (AS), I concluded that Everitt’s formulation of AS is unsuccessful. At the same time, however, I said that there is something about the AS I find intuitive and so I wanted to try revising AS as a … The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 2
The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 1
There is something about Nicholas Everitt’s argument from scale for atheism that appeals to my intuitions, but I haven’t been able to quite put my finger on what it is. So I’m going to try to reformulate the argument from scale as a Bayesian argument. Before I do, however, let’s review Everitt’s formulation of the argument. … The Argument from Scale (AS) Revisited, Part 1