Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 29: The Sub-Arguments for Premise (G)
WHERE WE ARE Premise (3a) is a key premise in the core argument of Objection #7 (Who Moved the Stone?) against the Swoon Theory. Here is the argument supporting premise (3a): In previous posts, I have shown that premise (C) is FALSE, and that premises (D1), (E), and (F) are DUBIOUS. So, it is abundantly … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 29: The Sub-Arguments for Premise (G)
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed