Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 27: The Sub-Argument for Premise (E)
WHERE WE ARE In Part 25 of this series, I showed that premise (C) in the sub-argument for the key premise (3a) is FALSE. Thus, the argument for (3a) is UNSOUND and should be rejected. Thus, premise (3a) is DUBIOUS and might well be FALSE. Therefore, the core argument of Objection #7 (Who Moved the … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 27: The Sub-Argument for Premise (E)
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed