Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 26: The Sub-Argument for Premise (D1)
WHERE WE ARE In Part 23 of this series, I provided a careful analysis of the argument constituting Objection #7 (Who Moved the Stone?) by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli against the Swoon Theory in Chapter 8 of their Handbook of Christian Apologetics (hereafter: HCA). In Part 24 of this series, I showed that the … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 26: The Sub-Argument for Premise (D1)
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed