Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 21: Premise (D) of Objection #6
WHERE WE ARE In Part 19 of this series, I presented a careful analysis of the argument constituting Objection #6 (Who Overpowered the Guards?) by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli. In Part 20 of this series, I showed that premise (G) was FALSE, and thus that the core argument of Objection #6 is UNSOUND and … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 21: Premise (D) of Objection #6
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed