Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 11: The Sub-Argument for Premise (2a)
THE SUB-ARGUMENT FOR THE KEY PREMISE (2A) Premise (2a) is a key premise in the core argument for Objection #4 against the Swoon Theory. Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli provide a sub-argument in support of premise (2a), so we need to consider that argument: 4a. According to the Gospel of John (Jn 19:38-42), on Friday … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 11: The Sub-Argument for Premise (2a)
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed