Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 6: Premise (D) of Objection #3
WHERE WE ARE In Part 5 of this series, I presented a clarified version of the argument by Peter Kreeft and Ronald Tacelli (in Chapter 8 of Handbook of Christian Apologetics; hereafter: HCA) that constitutes their Objection #3 against the Swoon Theory. In this current post, I will begin to critically evaluate that argument. THE … Continue reading Kreeft’s Case Against the Swoon Theory – Part 6: Premise (D) of Objection #3
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed