Month: December 2019

Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: What Joe Knows for Sure Just Ain’t So

What gets us into trouble is not what we don’t know It’s what we know for sure that just ain’t so – Mark Twain * I believe that what gets Joe Hinman into trouble is not so much what he doesn’t know as what he knows for sure that just ain’t so. According to Hinman: He [Brad Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: What Joe Knows for Sure Just Ain’t So

Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Seven Key NT Scholars

WHERE WE ARE Joe Hinman asserts that in recent decades there has been “a trend involving many scholars” in which “John has a new credibility”.  Because Hinman makes these assertions in response to my claim that the 4th Gospel is HISTORICALLY UNRELIABLE, and because Hinman then quotes Kermit Zarley’s assertion about three NT scholars arriving Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Seven Key NT Scholars

Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Scholars Do NOT Believe 4th Gospel is Reliable

Joe Hinman asserts that in recent decades there has been “a trend involving many scholars” in which “John has a new credibility”.  Because Hinman makes these assertions in response to my claim that the 4th Gospel is HISTORICALLY UNRELIABLE, and because Hinman quotes Kermit Zarley’s assertion about three NT scholars arriving at the conclusion that Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Scholars Do NOT Believe 4th Gospel is Reliable

Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Wishful Thinking by Joe Hinman

WHERE WE ARE Here is one of the main issues between Joe Hinman and me: In recent decades has a significant portion of NT scholars shifted from the previously dominant view that the Fourth Gospel is historically UNRELIABLE to the previously minority view that the Fourth Gospel is historically RELIABLE? My answer to this question Hinman’s Defense of his Sad Little Argument: Wishful Thinking by Joe Hinman